Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Acknowledgements 6
Prologue – What is Wrong with the United States of America? 7
Part I – Root Causes of the Impending Demise of American Democracy 12
Chapter 1 – Legalized Bribery of Government Officials 14
Chapter 2 – Human Psychological Factors 29
Chapter 3 – Corporatocracy 50
Chapter 4 – Corporate Control of Communications Media 61
Chapter 5 – Corrupt Election System 76
Chapter 6 – Government Secrecy and Shadow Government 89
Chapter 7 – American Exceptionalism & Unmentionable Things in US Politics 105
Part II – A Sampling of Imperialist Actions in U.S. History 123
Chapter 8 – Slavery and its Legacy 124
Chapter 9 – Early U.S. Expansion and Imperialism 138
Chapter 10 – U.S. Imperialism during the Cold War 150
Chapter 11 – The Iraq War and Occupation 166
Chapter 12 – The Afghanistan War and our Denial of Habeas Corpus 189
Part III – Consequences 199
Chapter 13 – The Election of George W. Bush as our President 200
Chapter 14 – War and Imperialism 205
Chapter 15 – Income and Wealth Inequality and Class Warfare 220
Chapter 16 – The Predator Financial Class 238
Chapter 17 – Shock Therapy: Economic Shenanigans on the World Stage 259
Chapter 18 – Contempt for International Law 271
Chapter 19 – The “War on Drugs” and the Prison Industry 283
Chapter 20 – Climate Change 305
Chapter 21 – “War on Terror” 328
Chapter 22 – Health Care 352
Chapter 23 – Unaccountable government 366
Chapter 24 – Failed Response to and Investigation of the 9/11 Attacks 380
Epilogue 392
About the Author 402
References 403
INTRODUCTION
The story of the founding of our
nation involves a stark mix of greatness combined with tragedy and failure. On
the one hand, the sentiments expressed in our founding document still serve
today, more than two and a quarter centuries after they were written, as a blueprint
for the most moral system of government among humans that was ever written. But
on the other hand, subsequent events deviated so much from the ideals expressed
in the American
Declaration of Independence that the whole endeavor has always been
surrounded by dark shadows. Though improvements were subsequently made that
ameliorated those dark shadows, they still exist to this day. The Americans who are of greatest value to our
country are those who seek to bring the reality of America closer to its promise – or
highest ideals. These people stand in stark contrast to those who constantly
proclaim the “greatness of America”,
without recognizing the need to improve their country by seeking to close the
gap between its ideals and its reality. Those people contribute much more to
our problems than to the solutions to our problems.
The
Declaration of Independence that founded the United States of America on July 4,
1776, is basically a proclamation against tyranny. It proclaims that all of humanity – not just
Americans, but all of humanity – has
the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Then it justifies the creation of our nation
by noting that it is the purpose of government to secure the inalienable rights
of its citizens, and that government derives its legitimacy only from the
consent of those whom it governs.
Therefore, whenever a government becomes destructive of that purpose, it
is the moral right of its citizens to abolish that government and construct
another in its place.
Notwithstanding
the lofty sentiments and purpose of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, the reality did not then – and still has not
– lived up to its ideal. Most obvious in
this regard was the institution of slavery, which in some respects made a
mockery of the sentiments expressed in our Declaration. Yet, it was a great start, and it served then
– as it still does – to shine as a beacon of hope for our infant nation, and
the rest of the world as well.
The dark side of the
United States of America
Since its founding, the actions
of the United States of America during its almost two and a half centuries of
existence, like most if not all the other nations of the world, contain a
mixture of good and bad – actions noble and ignoble. Yet most written histories of the United States
emphasize the good things while overlooking much of the bad. This is especially true of the teaching of U.S.
history to students.
In that
respect the United States
is probably not much different from other nations and cultures of the
world. Most or all nations and cultures
have a strong tendency to describe their histories and current actions in an
exaggerated favorable light. In that way
they attempt to elicit the cooperation or enthusiastic participation of their
members or citizens. If people believe
that their nation’s goals are noble and inspiring they will be inclined to
cooperate with those goals willingly. Many
of them will even willingly risk their lives by going to war in order to further
the goals of their nation. Even many of
those who don’t fully believe in the nobility of their nation’s goals will be
moved by peer pressure to willingly fight for them. Obtaining the willing cooperation and
enthusiastic participation of its citizens in furthering their goals is almost
always far preferable to a nation’s leaders than trying to obtain that
cooperation by force.
Most people
prefer it this way. Doing and believing
what they are told by their leaders is easier than developing their own beliefs
and plotting their own independent course of action based on an independent
assessment of the value of what they are advised to do. Furthermore, in following the prodding of
their leaders, people can make themselves feel that they are acting
“patriotically”. It helps to give them a
sense of identity, feel a connection to their fellow citizens and feel good
about themselves.
But
there are very important downsides to this kind of relationship between a
nation and its citizens. The “noble”
actions portrayed by the leaders may not be noble at all. Instead, they may be– and often are –
designed for the enrichment and private satisfaction of the leaders. They may – and often do – have terrible
consequences for hundreds, thousands, or millions of other people, including
those whose participation in their goals they endeavor to elicit. In short, nations can – and often have –
evolved into tyranny.
The end result
can be that a nation’s leaders create a system in which masses of people are led
around and manipulated like sheep – all for the benefit of the leaders, at the
great expense of everyone else. The
sheep see themselves as benefiting because they are spared the necessity of
doing the hard work of thinking for themselves, and because they are
manipulated into feeling good about themselves.
But just as an
individual cannot grow if he is unwilling to recognize his faults, a nation
cannot improve if its citizens are unwilling to look at and seriously consider
the dark side of their nation’s history and current actions. It may be very painful for some to do
that. But it is necessary in order to
facilitate the development of a nation that works for the benefit of all its
citizens rather than exclusively for its leaders.
Politicians against
historians – The attack on “National Standards for United States History”
A great
example of how politically difficult it is to challenge the standard feel good
stories told about our country is the U.S. Senate’s unanimous vote, in 1995, in
favor of rejecting the proposed National Standards
for United States History, by a vote of 99-1 (The one vote against the
resolution was cast because the Senator felt that the resolution wasn’t strong enough.)
Creation of the standards
The standards were produced by a
policy-setting body called the National Council for History Standards (NCHS),
consisting of the presidents of nine major organizations and twenty-two other
nationally recognized administrators, historians, and teachers, and two
taskforces of teachers in World and United States history, with
substantial input from thirty-one national organizations. The document was
created through an unprecedented process of open debate, multiple reviews, and
the active participation of the largest organizations
of history educators in the nation.
In
November 1994, NCHS released its document, which was meant to provide purely
voluntary guidelines for national curricula in history for grades 5-12. As explained by Gary Nash, who led the effort,
these standards were meant to have one thing in common: “to provide students
with a more comprehensive, challenging, and thought-provoking education in the
nation's public schools.” Their signature features were said to include “a new
framework for critical thinking and active learning” and “repeated references
to primary documents that would allow students to read and hear authentic voices
from the past”.
Controversy over the standards
Critics
focused largely on two main issues: Multiculturalism and so-called “political
correctness”. As an example, here is one article
which derogatorily refers to the “multi-cultis” who it is claimed wrote the
document to advance their “politically correct” and radically left point of
view. Lynn Cheney
aggressively criticized the document as containing “multicultural excess”, a
“grim and gloomy portrayal of American history”, “a politicized history”, and a
disparaging of the West. Other major critics of the document included Newt
Gingrich and Republican presidential candidates Pat Buchanan and Bob Dole. Dole blamed
the document on “the embarrassed to be American crowd” of “intellectual
elites”. With regard to the criticisms of “grimness and gloominess”, Nash had
this to say:
To be sure, it is not possible to recover the
history of women, African Americans, religious minorities, Native Americans,
laboring Americans, Latino Americans, and Asian Americans without addressing
issues of conflict, exploitation, and the compromising of the national ideals
set forth by the Revolutionary generation… To this extent, the standards
counseled a less self-congratulatory history of the United States and a less
triumphalist Western Civilization orientation toward world history.
Reduced to its core, the controversy thus
turned on how history can be used to train up the nation's youth. Almost all of
the critics of the history standards argued that young Americans would be
better served if they study the history presented before the 1960s, when
allegedly liberal and radical historians "politicized" the discipline
and abandoned an "objective" history in favor of pursuing their
personal political agendas.
Nash then discusses the historians’ point of view:
On the other side of the
cultural divide stands a large majority of historians. For many generations,
even when the profession was a guild of white Protestant males of the upper
class, historians have never regarded themselves as anti-patriots because they
revise history or examine sordid chapters of it. Indeed, they expose and
critique the past in order to improve American society and to protect dearly
won gains… This is not a new argument. Historians have periodically been at
sword's point with vociferous segments of the public, especially those of
deeply conservative bent.
So why then
did the U.S. Senate unanimously reject these standards? Well, the last thing our leaders want is for
our children to be taught a “grim and gloomy portrayal” of American History, as
Lynn Cheney described the Standards.
There were probably some U.S.
Senators who appreciated the value of these standards – as they voted to reject
them. But they knew that failing to vote
with their colleagues to reject them would be greatly frowned upon by the
powers that be and result in their being targeted for a political hatchet job
and even political extermination. A
system for teaching history to school children that rocks the boat by
questioning the motives of our great leaders or the unarguable and permanent
“greatness” of our nation is just too threatening to our nation’s leaders to be
allowed to exist.
The purpose of this
book
My purpose in writing this book
is to encourage my fellow American citizens to think more about the dark side
of their nation’s history, current policies and current directions – in the
belief that this is the surest way to make us better than who we are
today.
Our history
has been a mixture of wise and stupid, moral and immoral actions. Yet, most Americans are led to believe that
we are so far superior to the other peoples of the world that we have the moral
right to force them to do whatever we believe to be in our best interests – which we claim to be in the best interests of
everyone. Such an attitude is arrogant,
hypocritical and dangerous in the extreme.
Worse, we are
moving swiftly in the wrong direction. A
minority of very wealthy and powerful people – an elite oligarchy – has
concentrated more and more power and wealth into their own hands, and they
continue to do so. In the midst of the
worst economic crisis our country has known since the Great Depression of the
1930s, tens of thousands of Americans die every year because they can’t afford
decent health care, millions lose their homes, and millions are driven into
poverty, while those institutions and individuals responsible for the crisis
make record profits and take home multi-million dollar salaries and
bonuses.
To distract us
from the true cause of our crises, the oligarchy tries to turn us against each
other. As I begin to write this book,
the Governor of Wisconsin is attempting to demonize and destroy the public
employees unions in his state. This is
one part of an ongoing war against American labor unions – one of the last
bastions of hope for the working people of our country.
In summary
The problems facing our country
and the world are enormous.
Unfortunately, we are now at a time in U.S. history when anti-democratic
forces in our country are expanding, leading to the concentration of wealth and
power in fewer and fewer hands, as our nation’s previously robust middle class
continues to shrink and become more and more insecure. In many respects this represents a vicious
downward cycle. The more power
accumulated by the oligarchy, the more power they have to accumulate more power
and successfully demand the passage of legislation that adds still more to
their increasing power and wealth.
One important key – perhaps the most important key – to breaking and
reversing this downward vicious cycle lies in an accumulating awareness by the
American people about the true nature of the roots of their nation’s problems
(Part I), its history (Part II), and the current status and nature of their most
pressing problems (Part III). Finding
ways to facilitate this task is one of the greatest and most important
challenges of the 21 Century.